|When||Fri 8:30 am – 11:30 am, 40-minute session|
|Where||Listed in your critique registration info|
|Bring||Up to 15 of your prints and/or digital images|
|Cost||$45 by June 24 (Deadline to sign-up)|
Note: Critiques run concurrently with Pre-Conference Workshops so you cannot attend both.
One of the special opportunities available to NECCC conference attendees is a one-on-one evaluation of your photographs (up to 15 images, prints and/or digital) by an experienced, accomplished New England photographer. Susan Mosser, firstname.lastname@example.org, will send confirmation by June 26th including a form that must be returned by July 1st. You will then be contacted via email with the time slot and reviewer to whom you have been assigned.
You bring 15 images or perhaps a few more in case time is available. The images may be prints and/or digital. Prints are laid out on a table for review. The reviewer loads digital images from a memory stick into a computer and examines them using a program such as Lightroom. You and the reviewer then carefully examine each image. The reviewer offers suggestions on how you might improve the composition, technical quality or other aspects of each image. She/he will also consider your images as a group. You will also be able to ask questions regarding tools, techniques, selecting images, judging, etc.
Creative people don’t have absolute standards against which they can measure their work. Much of its value depends on how well it connects with another viewer. When you look at your own images, you remember the special experiences you had when you captured them or how hard you had to work. The person critiquing your images is only looking at the final versions and will probably see them differently than you do. All creative people, not just photographers, have a variety of ways to receive feedback. Writers rely on editors to help them improve while speakers depend on audience reactions. Musicians attend master classes to refine their technique guided by an experienced performer. We all need help from mentors to improve our craft. The critiques at the NECCC Conference provide an opportunity to receive knowledgeable feedback. Why not try it?
Proficient in both Mac or PC, and Photo editing. International Exhibition competitor, print maker. Extremely knowledgeable in all aspects of Photography. Photo Travel, landscapes, informal portraits, street scenes and cityscapes are his main subject matter. Judges throughout New England.
Hazel Meredith is an award-winning photographer, teacher, speaker, workshop leader, and a highly respected competition judge. In 2007, she began teaching post-processing techniques through local adult education programs, and now teaches at camera clubs and conferences across the U.S. (both in-person as well as online), and through her own workshops. She offers her own webinars on various creative post-processing techniques, and has done webinars for Topaz Labs and Design Cuts. She released her first eBook, “Working with Textures & Overlays: Turn Ho-Hum into a Work of Art” in 2015, the sequel in April 2019 and is currently working on her third book.
Proficient in both Mac or PC, and Photo editing. Has own Photo Business shooting Bed and Breakfast Inns. Photographs still life’s, portraits, scenics, and architecture. Teaches and judges throughout New England. Print maker.
Being a portfolio reviewer is my favorite activity at the NECCC conference – year after year! Like a child having a great tutor, a good reviewer takes the level of the presented work and drives it up a giant step. The reviewer begins a few weeks before the conference by familiarizing himself/herself with the attendees/subject’s personal work. This information has been passed to the reviewer via the conference chair people – well before the actual conference weekend. And then during the session, the reviewer presents to the attendee, thoughtful and organized, step by step, suggestions on how to improve his/her work. Also, there is plenty of time to point out the strengths and talents seen in the attendee’s portfolio. This is an important part of growth – as building blocks and through a simple confidence boost in one’s abilities!
One of the reasons that I think the portfolio reviews are beneficial, is due to the personal nature of the review itself. It would take months and months – if not years – at a camera club to get this kind of personal attention and close-up scrutiny over an image. Judges have a limited time on competition night, often with hundreds of images on which they must focus and comment. And maybe only one or two belong to any one person. During a review at NECCC a reviewer may speak about 20 or 25 personal images- each in detail. Often too, the attendee will begin to see ‘negative patterns’ that need attention, but may not be seen otherwise unless looked at in groupings. One thing that NECCC attendees may not understand, is that they don’t need a “fancy portfolio”. Several people who have not had their portfolio’s reviewed mentioned to me that they did not do it because they didn’t have a ‘portfolio’. This review session just involves bringing a series of photographs (print and/or digital) to get feedback on.
PC user only, International Exhibition Competitor, Print maker. Photographs anything but primarily nature, macro, sports, street photography and landscapes. Teaches on Nature photography and basics in photography. Judges throughout New England.
His approach to the review is to look at a participant’s entire submitted work to get a sense of the photographer’s style and interests before rushing in and applying the standard critiques. He lets them explain what they were trying to achieve with each image. Then, where and when appropriate, he offers suggestions to improve their work and their photographic vision, not only with a critique of the work, but also offering tips and how-tos along with where to go for certain photos to improve their photographic experience.
This is a great private learning experience personalized to fit your individual needs and questions. We had one attendee who signed up for the reviews three years in a row asking for the same reviewer each time and every year she listened to the comments, asked questions and worked to improve her work. Each year the reviewer saw great improvement in her images, taking her from a Class B competition/photographer to a Class AA .